MPU3193- Philosophy and Current Issues - Topic 3 Part B

MPU3193- Philosophy and Current Issues - Topic 3 Part B

University

10 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

SLT as an explanation of aggression

SLT as an explanation of aggression

University

15 Qs

Quizz SPPIA By Andy Fefta Wijaya, PH.D (FIA UB)

Quizz SPPIA By Andy Fefta Wijaya, PH.D (FIA UB)

University

10 Qs

INTRODUCTION ON MANAGEMENT

INTRODUCTION ON MANAGEMENT

University

15 Qs

FIM Week 4 Tutorial

FIM Week 4 Tutorial

University

10 Qs

AFYOP Refresher

AFYOP Refresher

University

15 Qs

Research and Publication

Research and Publication

University

10 Qs

Importance of Communication in Customer Service

Importance of Communication in Customer Service

11th Grade - University

10 Qs

environmental education

environmental education

University

10 Qs

MPU3193- Philosophy and Current Issues - Topic 3 Part B

MPU3193- Philosophy and Current Issues - Topic 3 Part B

Assessment

Quiz

Other

University

Practice Problem

Easy

Created by

KENNY DALGLISH

Used 24+ times

FREE Resource

AI

Enhance your content in a minute

Add similar questions
Adjust reading levels
Convert to real-world scenario
Translate activity
More...

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How can abductive reasoning be used in solving a crime investigation?

By randomly accusing individuals without evidence.

By ignoring evidence and focusing on intuition alone.

By forming hypotheses based on evidence and testing them through investigation.

By relying solely on eyewitness testimonies.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Provide an example of abductive reasoning in medical diagnosis.

Ignoring symptoms and making a random diagnosis

Forming a hypothesis based on observed symptoms and then finding evidence to support it.

Guessing the diagnosis without any evidence

Relying solely on patient's self-diagnosis

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Explain how abductive reasoning is applied in scientific research.

Abductive reasoning is used to prove hypotheses in scientific research

Abductive reasoning involves only confirming existing beliefs in scientific research

Abductive reasoning is applied in scientific research by proposing possible explanations for observed phenomena and then evaluating these explanations based on their ability to account for the data.

Abductive reasoning is not relevant to scientific research

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Give a real-life scenario where abductive reasoning is used in business decision-making.

Analyzing customer complaints to identify product/service issues

Reviewing financial statements to assess company performance

Conducting market research to understand consumer preferences

Implementing cost-cutting measures to increase profitability

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Discuss the role of abductive reasoning in historical analysis.

Abductive reasoning plays a crucial role in historical analysis by allowing historians to infer the most likely explanation for historical events based on incomplete or ambiguous evidence.

Abductive reasoning is only used in scientific research, not historical analysis

Abductive reasoning is not relevant in historical analysis

Abductive reasoning leads to biased historical interpretations

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Describe a situation where abductive reasoning is employed in psychology.

A psychologist uses abductive reasoning to propose a theory to explain a patient's symptoms based on the available information and prior knowledge.

A psychologist uses abductive reasoning to predict the outcome of a controlled experiment.

Abductive reasoning is used in psychology to calculate statistical probabilities of behavior.

Abductive reasoning in psychology involves analyzing dreams to determine personality traits.

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In what ways can abductive reasoning be utilized in creative problem-solving?

By randomly selecting a hypothesis without evidence

By proposing possible explanations or hypotheses, evaluating them based on evidence, and selecting the most plausible one.

By ignoring all possible explanations

By always choosing the least plausible hypothesis

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

Already have an account?