ez test for writting task 1

The line graph below compares the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in four countries in billions of US dollar. Which is true?

• As can be seen, Pakistan had a better GDP than other countries listed in the diagram and GDP is Malaysia remained constant throughout the time.

• As can be seen, Malaysia had a better GDP than other countries listed in the diagram and GDP is Nepal remained constant throughout the time.

• As can be seen, Nepal had a better GDP than other countries listed in the diagram and GDP is Bangladesh remained constant throughout the time.

• As can be seen, Bangladesh had a better GDP than other countries listed in the diagram and GDP is Pakistan remained constant throughout the time.

Câu nào nói một cách tổng quát về biểu đồ trên?

• GDP in Malaysia was approximately 270 billion US dollar in 2010 which was the highest among the given countries.

• GDP in Nepal was approximately 110 billion US dollar in 2010 which was the lowest among the given countries.

• GDP in Malaysia was approximately 270 billion US dollar in 2010 which was the lowest among the given countries.

• GDP in Nepal was approximately 270 billion US dollar in 2010 which was the highest among the given countries.

• While GDP in three different increased, Malaysia GDP remained constantly throughout the period of time.

• While GDP in three different increased, Bangladesh GDP remained constantly throughout the period of time.

• While GDP in three different increased, Nepal GDP remained constantly throughout the period of time.

• While GDP in three different increased, Pakistan GDP remained constantly throughout the period of time.

so who do you love?

• me

• urself

chọn câu trả lời đúng

• GDP in Malaysia was 300 billion dollar in 2015, which was the lowest.

• GDP in Malaysia was 300 billion dollar in 2015, which was the highest.

• GDP in Nepal was 20 billion dollar in 2015, which was the highest.

• GDP in Pakistin was 280 billion dollar in 2015, which was the highest.

The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university. Look at the table and choose the best introduction:

• The table illustrates the proportion of students rated positively different aspects of a university over the period of 10 years from 2000 to 2010.

• The table illustrated the proportion of students rated positively different aspects of a university over the period of 10 years from 2000 to 2010.

• The table illustrates the proportion of students rated negatively different aspects of a university the period of 10 years from 2000 to 2010.

• The table illustrated the proportion of students rated positively different aspects of a university over the period of 10 years from 2000 to 2010.

The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in millions) of telephone calls in Finland, divided into three categories, from 1995 – 2004. Choose the suitabale answer for introduction:

• The given bar chart demontrates the whole data on the three different types of calling in Finland between 1995 and 2004.

• The giving pie chart demontrates the whole data in the three different types of calling in Finland between 1995 and 2004.

• The given bar chart demontrates the whole datas on the three different types of calling in Finland between 1995 and 2004.

• The giving bar chart demontrates the whole data on the three different types of calling on Finland between 1995 and 2004.

The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. Average distance in miles travelled per person per year. Now then paraphrase the topic and choose the introduction:

• The given table data delineates how the vehicle preferences of the British changed over time by comparing the average distance in 1985 and 2000.

• The gived table data delineated how the vehicle preferences of British change over time by comparing the average distances in 1985 and 2000.

• The given table data delineates how the vehicle preferences of the British changed over time by compare the average distance from 1985 to 2000.

The diagram below shows the number of houses built per year in two cities, Derby and Nottingham, Between 2000 and 2009.

• The given bar chart compares the construction of new houses in two cities, Derby and Nottingham, over the period of 2000 and 2009.

• The given bar chart compares the construction of new houses in two different cities, Derby and Nottingham, from 2000 to 2009.

• The given bar chart shows the number of new houses built in two distinguish cities, namely Derby and Nottingham, from 2000 to 2009.

• All are right.

The diagram below shows the number of houses built per year in two cities, Derby and Nottingham, Between 2000 and 2009.

• Overall, more houses were built in Nottingham than Derby each year except in 2000, 2001 and 2007.

• It can be clearly seen that more houses built in Derby than Nottingham each year except in 2000, 2001 and 2007.