Wellness Programs Don't Seem to Work as Advertised

The video discusses employer-sponsored health insurance in the U.S., focusing on wellness programs as a cost-control measure. Despite their popularity, research shows these programs often fail to deliver promised savings and health improvements. Financial incentives can become penalties, raising fairness concerns. The Affordable Care Act supports such programs, allowing higher penalties. A case study of PepsiCo's program shows potential long-term savings, but mainly from disease management, not lifestyle changes. Employers may misunderstand research, thinking any wellness program reduces costs, but this is not always true.

What insights were revealed about employers' views on controlling health care costs?

How do wellness programs typically incentivize employees to improve their health?

What percentage of firms with more than 200 workers use financial incentives tied to health objectives?

What are some criticisms of wellness programs based on research findings?

In what ways can wellness programs lead to higher costs for employees?

What role does the Affordable Care Act play in wellness programs?

How did Pepsi Co's wellness program demonstrate long-term savings?