Interpreting the Law - An Example

The video discusses the Smith case, a legal example from the University of Southern California's School of Philosophy. It examines the complexities of interpreting laws, particularly focusing on a provision about using a gun during a felony. The Supreme Court ruled that Smith, who traded a gun for drugs, should receive an additional five-year sentence based on the plain meaning of 'using a gun.' The discussion highlights the importance of context and the challenges of legal interpretation.

What does the term 'plain meaning' refer to in the context of legal interpretation as discussed in the Smith case?

In what way could Congress have been more specific regarding the law discussed in the Smith case?