Debating Defenses

The video features a debate on active defense in cybersecurity, focusing on whether companies should engage in 'hack back' tactics. Corey argues against it, citing risks and legal issues, while Ariel suggests a more nuanced approach, emphasizing professional preparedness and collaboration with law enforcement. The discussion also touches on historical piracy analogies, the role of private security, and the need for international cooperation. Both agree on the importance of empowering law enforcement and setting clear legal boundaries.

What are the potential consequences of allowing private companies to engage in active defense?

In what ways do the speakers propose to empower law enforcement in the context of cybersecurity?

What are the key differences between historical piracy and modern cyber attacks as highlighted in the text?

What strategies do the speakers suggest for changing the payoff matrix for cyber attackers?