Yousaf outlines plans for an independent Scotland to have a written constitution

The video discusses the engagement of Scottish Civic Society and contrasts it with the Westminster government's approach. It highlights the UK's lack of a codified constitution and the implications of Westminster's supremacy, including the potential repeal of the Human Rights Act. The video advocates for Scottish independence, emphasizing the benefits of a written constitution that protects key rights and values. It outlines the process for creating a constitution post-independence, involving public consultation and a referendum.

What are the implications of not having a codified constitution in the UK?

In what ways has the UK government undermined constitutional principles according to the text?

How does the principle of sovereignty relate to the people of Scotland according to the text?

What role does the Scottish Parliament play in the interim constitution after independence?

What process is proposed for creating a permanent constitution after Scottish independence?