Unintended Consequences

The video explores the disparity in ADHD diagnosis rates between states like North Carolina and California, examining factors such as demographics, culture, and school policies. It highlights the role of consequential accountability laws and the No Child Left Behind Act in increasing diagnosis rates, particularly among poorer children. The unintended effects of these policies on ADHD diagnosis are discussed, with a focus on the incentives for schools to boost test scores.

What factors were considered to explain the differences in ADHD diagnosis rates between North Carolina and California?

How did the Bell Commission report influence educational policies in the following years?

What was the impact of the No Child Left Behind policy on ADHD diagnosis rates among poor children?

Discuss the unintended effects of accountability laws on ADHD diagnosis rates.

What role do demographics play in the diagnosis rates of ADHD in different states?