Dangerous Purity

The video discusses societal purification movements and their often negative consequences. It highlights the historical acceptance of deception as part of the social fabric and contrasts it with purism, using examples like the Reformation and modern movements like ISIS. The video also examines historical figures like Hitler and Robespierre, who pursued purity and truth, leading to coercive outcomes. It concludes by suggesting that truth in politics may not be as valuable as in other realms, advocating for acceptance of fallibility.

What does the text suggest about the nature of truth in politics compared to other realms?

How does the text propose we should deal with our inability to discover the truth?