CLEAN : Japan disappointed by ICJs whaling decision

The transcript discusses a court ruling on Japan's whaling practices, specifically the Jarpa 2 program. Japan, respecting international law, will abide by the decision, which may influence whaling activities in other countries like Iceland and Norway. However, the ruling does not automatically protect endangered species such as humpbacks and fin whales. The decision highlights the need for a solid scientific program to justify any future whaling activities.

What does the ruling state about the Japanese killing program in relation to scientific standards?

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

What are the potential future considerations for Japan's whaling practices following the court's ruling?

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF