Tanaiste rejects accusations Catherine Martin has been a ‘hands-off’ media minister during RTE crisis

The transcript discusses Catherine Martin's perceived lack of involvement and the minister's comprehensive response in Roctus. It highlights the breakdown in the minister's confidence and relationship with the chair, expressing regret over the situation. The minister's expectations for clear answers and accountability in decision-making are emphasized.

What was the minister's approach to answering questions in the Roctus?

• She avoided answering questions.

• She answered questions comprehensively.

• She delegated the questions to someone else.

• She refused to attend the session.

What was the main reason for the breakdown in the relationship?

• The minister's decision to resign.

• A personal conflict between the minister and the chair.

• A disagreement over financial matters.

• The minister's lack of confidence in the responses received.

What did the minister expect when she put forward questions and views?

• To be ignored.

• To get clear answers and be fully informed.

• To receive vague responses.

• To be criticized.

How did the minister feel about the breakdown in confidence?

• She was indifferent.

• She was adamant about the need for clear communication.

• She was unaware of the situation.

• She was pleased with the outcome.

What was the minister's stance on significant decisions?

• She believed they should be made without consultation.

• She wanted to be informed about who was responsible for them.

• She preferred to delegate them entirely.

• She thought they were unimportant.