Regulation Scholar: At Least, China and the US Are Talking

The video discusses the ongoing tensions between the US and China regarding AI technology, focusing on digital surveillance and ideological differences. It highlights the EU's proactive approach to AI regulation, particularly the AI Act, and the challenges posed by generative AI technologies. The Brussels Effect is examined, illustrating how EU regulations set global standards. The video concludes with a discussion on the importance of collaborative governance involving tech companies and governments to ensure effective AI regulation.

What is one of the main concerns of the US and EU regarding China's use of AI?

• Promoting digital democracy

• Increasing digital surveillance

• Facilitating global trade

• Enhancing economic growth

What is the EU's anticipated legislative measure to regulate AI?

• AI Innovation Act

• AI Surveillance Act

• AI Act

• AI Development Act

What challenge did the EU face during the legislative process for AI regulation?

• Emergence of generative AI technologies

• Opposition from tech companies

• Lack of public support

• Insufficient funding

What is a key focus in the global governance of AI?

• Limiting international collaboration

• Reducing technological innovation

• Maximizing profits

• Ensuring transparency and accountability

What is the EU's stance on AI governance?

• It should be based on market forces

• It should be ignored

• It should be entrenched in legislation and democratic governance

• It should be left to tech companies

What is the purpose of the ongoing dialogue between the EU, US, and tech industry?

• To increase AI production

• To establish a code of conduct for AI development

• To promote AI in entertainment

• To reduce AI research funding

What is the potential impact of the Brussels effect in AI regulation?

• It sets a global standard for AI regulation

• It limits AI development to Europe

• It reduces AI innovation

• It increases AI costs