CLEAN : Lawyer for man acquitted of Daniel Pearl murder speaks outside Pakistan court

The Supreme Court of Pakistan dismissed appeals by the Sindh government against a previous judgment. The court accepted an appeal, granting complete equity and stating that the individual involved committed no offense and should not have been imprisoned. The court ordered the immediate release of the individual, emphasizing that there are no other pending cases against them. The expectation is that the Sindh government will comply with the court's decision to uphold justice.

What was the outcome of the appeals filed by the Sindh government?

• They were accepted by the court.

• They were dismissed by the Supreme Court.

• They were partially accepted.

• They were sent back for further review.

Who else filed petitions that were dismissed by the court?

• The Sindh government

• The family of late Daniel

• The Supreme Court

• The High Court

What did the court decide regarding the individual's imprisonment?

• The individual should remain in prison.

• The individual should be transferred to another facility.

• The individual should not have been imprisoned at all.

• The individual should be given a reduced sentence.

What did the court order regarding the individual's release?

• The release should happen immediately unless there are other cases.

• The release should be delayed for further investigation.

• The release should be conditional on a fine.

• The release should be decided by the Sindh government.

What is the court's stance on the Sindh government's potential delay in releasing the individual?

• The court has no opinion on the delay.

• The court supports the delay.

• The court expects no delay without valid reasons.

• The court suggests a delay for public safety.