CLEAN : Reactions outside court after Harvey Weinstein is jailed for 23 years

The transcript captures a discussion on the emotional reactions and reflections following a legal verdict. It includes criticism of the judge and jury, reflections on the fairness of the legal process, and a message about societal change and support for victims. The speaker expresses anger and disappointment with the verdict, while also acknowledging the need for more voices to speak out against injustice.

What was the speaker's opinion about the court's decision?

• The speaker believed the decision was influenced by external pressures.

• The speaker thought the decision was fair and just.

• The speaker was satisfied with the decision.

• The speaker had no opinion on the decision.

How did the speaker feel about the evidence presented in the case?

• The speaker was unsure about the evidence.

• The speaker thought the evidence clearly established guilt.

• The speaker believed the evidence was irrelevant.

• The speaker felt the evidence was insufficient.

What did the speaker question about the defendant's remorse?

• The speaker questioned the legality of the remorse.

• The speaker questioned the sincerity of the remorse.

• The speaker questioned the timing of the remorse.

• The speaker questioned the public's reaction to the remorse.

What message does the speaker hope the sentence will convey?

• That the sentence was too harsh.

• That the sentence was too lenient.

• That the legal system is flawed.

• That times have changed and more people should speak out.

Who does the speaker express gratitude towards?

• The general public.

• The defense attorneys.

• The jurors and prosecuting team.

• The media.