Retired Justice Kennedy Says High Court Judges Never Lobby Each Other

The transcript discusses the influence of draft opinions on justices' votes, the dynamics between majority and dissent opinions, and the decision-making process of the Supreme Court. It highlights the ethical considerations in justice interactions and the social dynamics among justices, emphasizing the importance of written communication and the avoidance of lobbying.

What is the primary purpose of circulating draft opinions among justices?

• To ensure all justices are aware of the majority opinion

• To finalize the decision before public announcement

• To influence and potentially change the votes of other justices

• To gather public opinion on the draft

How does the Supreme Court view its role in terms of majority and minority opinions over time?

• As indifferent to public perception

• As majoritarian over time despite short-term unpopularity

• As always aligning with public opinion

• As anti-majority in the long term

What is considered a serious violation among justices when discussing cases?

• Suggesting changes in wording

• Discussing cases at social events

• Trading votes between cases

• Writing memos to each other

What is a common practice among justices to enhance the persuasiveness of an opinion?

• Discussing it over lunch

• Ignoring dissenting opinions

• Making verbal agreements

• Suggesting changes in wording

How do justices typically handle discussions about cases during social events?

• They only discuss cases with close friends

• They openly discuss cases to gather opinions

• They avoid discussing cases to maintain politeness

• They use social events to finalize decisions