Ruth Bader Ginsberg Says Cameras in Court Give 'the Wrong Impression'

The transcript discusses Justice David Souter's strong opposition to televising Supreme Court hearings, citing concerns about public misunderstanding and the potential for advocates to perform for the camera. It highlights the difference between trial and appellate advocacy, emphasizing that appeals are more focused on written arguments. Judges prepare extensively by reading trial court opinions and briefs before hearings, which can lead to preconceived leanings. The transcript argues that televising appellate arguments gives a misleading impression that they are akin to debates, which is not the case.

Why does the speaker believe that appellate arguments are misunderstood by the public?

What impression does the speaker believe is given by the way appellate arguments are presented?