Uber's Kalanick Stands Up to Waymo's Lawyers at Trial

The video discusses the second day of Travis Kalanick's testimony in a legal case involving Uber and Waymo. Waymo's lawyers did not press Kalanick hard, which was surprising given the evidence they had. Kalanick often responded with 'I don't know' or 'I don't remember' to difficult questions. After his testimony, a forensic expert presented technical evidence against Uber, which was more damaging. The video also anticipates future testimonies, including that of Larry Page, and questions how deeply the jury will engage with the evidence.

What was surprising about Waymo's approach during Travis Kalanick's cross-examination?

• They presented new evidence.

• They avoided asking difficult questions.

• They were very aggressive.

• They called additional witnesses.

What role did the computer forensic expert play in the trial?

• He provided evidence against Waymo.

• He defended Uber's technical practices.

• He testified about Travis Kalanick's actions.

• He evaluated and presented technical evidence against Uber.

How did the forensic expert's testimony differ from Travis Kalanick's?

• It was less detailed.

• It was more technical and detailed.

• It was less credible.

• It was more emotional.

What is anticipated about Larry Page's upcoming testimony?

• It will be very aggressive.

• It will be similar to Kalanick's.

• It will require him to be more assertive.

• It will be canceled.

What challenge do juries face in this case?

• Deciding on the credibility of witnesses.

• Understanding complex technical evidence.

• Managing the length of the trial.

• Avoiding media influence.