CLEAN : IAEA voices voices deep concern over Iran nuclear inspector incident

The transcript discusses Iran's detention of an IEA inspector, which was deemed an unwarranted act of intimidation. The board expressed deep concern and demanded Iran resolve open issues and respect inspectors' privileges. Despite security concerns, the inspector's departure was smooth. The agency must cooperate in investigating potential wrongful acts. Iran, like other agency members, must ensure the safety of its nuclear installations, especially given past sabotage attempts.

What was the board's reaction to Iran's detention of the IEA inspector?

• They expressed deep concern and called for resolution.

• They supported Iran's actions.

• They praised Iran for its security measures.

• They ignored the incident.

How was the inspector's departure handled despite security concerns?

• It was ignored by the agency.

• It was obstructed by Iran.

• It was facilitated smoothly and quickly.

• It was delayed significantly.

What obligation does the agency have regarding its staff and inspectors?

• To ignore any wrongful acts.

• To prevent any investigations.

• To cooperate in investigating possible wrongful acts.

• To always support their actions without question.

What is Iran's stance on actions against nuclear installation safety?

• They encourage sabotage attempts.

• They are indifferent to safety concerns.

• They cannot condone any such behavior.

• They condone such actions.

Why is it important for Iran to ensure the safety of its nuclear installations?

• Because they are not important.

• To ignore international concerns.

• To allow for more sabotage.

• Due to past sabotage attempts.