Harvey Weinstein: Legal Experts Say Criminal Case Could Be On Shaky Ground | THR News

The case against Harvey Weinstein faces challenges as legal setbacks and credibility issues arise. Key evidence, such as emails and testimonies, have been questioned, impacting the prosecution's stance. Defense strategies focus on undermining accuser credibility and presenting exculpatory evidence. The case highlights the tension between the Me Too movement's goals and legal proof requirements, emphasizing the importance of due process.

What was the reason for the dismissal of Lucia Evans's allegations against Weinstein?

• The statute of limitations expired

• Evans withdrew her testimony

• Contradictory information not passed to prosecutors

• Lack of evidence

What impact did the emails from Miriam Mimi Haley have on the case?

• They were not presented in court

• They supported her allegations

• They were dismissed as irrelevant

• They questioned her credibility

What was the effect of the allegations against Azure Argento on the prosecution's case?

• Undermined Argento's credibility

• Had no impact

• Led to new charges against Weinstein

• Strengthened the case against Weinstein

What is the defense's strategy regarding the emails presented as evidence?

• To use them to file counter-charges

• To dismiss the emails as fake

• To show consensual relationships

• To prove the accusers' credibility

How does the legal requirement of proof in a criminal case affect the Me Too movement, according to the transcript?

• It challenges the movement's aspirations

• It supports the movement's goals

• It leads to more convictions

• It has no effect