CLEAN : Syria thanks BRICS for support

The transcript discusses the importance of dialogue in resolving the Syrian conflict, highlighting the stance of countries that demand President Assad's departure. It emphasizes the role of BRICS nations in promoting reason and preventing Syria from facing Libya's fate. The speaker calls for more vocal support from major countries to stop violence, suggesting they have more influence than currently shown.

What is the stance of those who refuse to engage in dialogue regarding President Assad?

• They demand President Assad's resignation before any dialogue.

• They support President Assad unconditionally.

• They want President Assad to stay in power.

• They are indifferent to President Assad's position.

Which countries are mentioned as bringing reason to the international community's approach to Syria?

• Russia, China, India, Brazil, and BRICS

• United States and United Kingdom

• Japan and South Korea

• France and Germany

What is the potential consequence mentioned if reason was not introduced by certain countries?

• Syria would have faced economic sanctions.

• Syria would have faced a situation similar to Libya.

• Syria would have become a global superpower.

• Syria would have achieved peace quickly.

What is the speaker's suggestion to larger countries regarding their role in stopping violence?

• They should withdraw from international discussions.

• They should focus on their own domestic issues.

• They should be more vocal and active.

• They should remain neutral.

According to the speaker, how much influence do big countries have on the international scene?

• Their influence is irrelevant.

• They have no influence at all.

• They have more influence than they are currently showing.

• They have less influence than they think.