Civil Rights Act of 1866 ( 1981 actions)

The video explains the 1981 Act, a post-Civil War law ensuring equal rights to contract, particularly in employment. It highlights the Act's application in hiring, work environment, and firing scenarios, comparing it to Title 7. Unlike Title 7, the 1981 Act allows lawsuits without EEOC procedures and offers unlimited damages. Despite Title 7's coverage, the 1981 Act remains relevant in race-based employment discrimination cases.

What was the primary purpose of the 1981 Act when it was introduced?

• To ensure equal contract rights for all individuals

• To establish a national banking system

• To promote agricultural development

• To regulate international trade

In which employment scenarios does the 1981 Act apply?

• Hiring, hostile work environment, and discriminatory firing

• Employee training, team building, and performance reviews

• Salary negotiations, promotions, and retirement

• Workplace safety, health benefits, and overtime pay

How does the 1981 Act differ from Title 7 in terms of legal procedures?

• It requires more documentation

• It limits the number of lawsuits

• It mandates a longer waiting period

• It allows bypassing EEOC procedures

What type of damages does the 1981 Act allow that Title 7 does not?

• No damages at all

• Only punitive damages

• Unlimited compensatory and punitive damages

• Limited compensatory damages

Why is the 1981 Act still relevant despite the existence of Title 7?

• It is easier to understand

• It covers more types of discrimination

• It applies to international cases

• It offers a streamlined legal process and unlimited damages