CLEAN : Four members of Kenya's electoral commission declare results 'unconstitutional'

The transcript discusses the actions of the commissions chairperson during an election, highlighting his role as a national returning officer, which is deemed non-existent. The chairperson declared results without plenary approval, preventing discussion on potential disparities. The process used to generate form 34C for declaring presidential election results was considered opaque and lacked credibility, failing to gain the confidence of all commissioners.

What role did the commission's chairperson assume during the election process?

• Vote counter

• Constitutional advisor

• Election observer

• National returning officer

What was the reaction of the commissioners to the chairperson's declaration of results?

• They found it unconstitutional

• They were indifferent

• They celebrated the results

• They fully supported it

How did the chairperson handle the announcement of the election results?

• He allowed a detailed discussion

• He presented the results without discussion

• He postponed the announcement

• He consulted with all commissioners

What was the main issue with the process used to generate form 34C?

• It was transparent and clear

• It was delayed

• It was opaque and lacked credibility

• It was approved by all commissioners

What was missing in the explanation of the election results process?

• A written report

• A public announcement

• A media briefing

• A credible and verifiable explanation