U.S. Supreme Court Rulings Expected on Census, Obamacare

The video discusses key Supreme Court decisions, focusing on the Auer doctrine, the potential addition of a citizenship question to the census, and partisan gerrymandering cases. The Auer doctrine involves judicial deference to regulatory agencies, with businesses seeking more consistent interpretations. The census debate centers on a proposed citizenship question, which opponents argue could lead to an undercount in Hispanic areas. The gerrymandering cases involve partisan map drawing in North Carolina and Maryland, with the court's potential stance on judicial intervention in such matters.

What is the 'our doctrine' primarily concerned with?

• Judges deferring to regulatory agencies' interpretation of their own regulations

• Agencies deferring to businesses for regulatory interpretations

• Businesses making their own regulatory decisions

• Judges creating new regulations

What is the main concern of opponents regarding the addition of a citizenship question to the census?

• It will decrease the number of Republican voters

• It will have no impact on the census results

• It will lead to an undercount in certain communities

• It will increase the response rate in Hispanic areas

What is the primary focus of the gerrymandering cases discussed?

• Judicial gerrymandering

• Partisan gerrymandering

• Racial gerrymandering

• Economic gerrymandering

Which state is mentioned as having a gerrymandering case involving Republicans?

• Maryland

• North Carolina

• Texas

• California

What is the potential outcome if the court decides not to intervene in gerrymandering cases?

• Judges will decide on district boundaries

• Gerrymandering will be eliminated

• Courts will redraw district lines

• Politicians will continue to consider politics in drawing district lines