Interview with UKIP leader Nigel Farage

The transcript discusses the debate over the Hunting Act, with a focus on the improbability of its repeal. It highlights protests against UKIP, driven by their immigration policies, and notes the involvement of trade unions. The conversation draws parallels to past protests against conservative figures and the BNP. Concerns about far-right associations with UKIP are addressed, emphasizing not to judge the party by individual actions.

What is the political reality regarding the Hunting Act as discussed in the video?

• It has already been repealed.

• It is not a significant issue.

• It is unlikely to be repealed.

• It is likely to be repealed soon.

What is the irony mentioned about the trade unions' involvement in the protests against UKIP?

• They are unaware of the protests.

• They are funding the protests against a party that supports workers' rights.

• They are supporting UKIP's policies.

• They are neutral in the political debate.

Why are the protests against UKIP described as misplaced?

• Because UKIP is addressing important issues.

• Because UKIP is not a significant political party.

• Because the protests are not well-organized.

• Because the opposition is based on outdated issues.

What historical context is provided for the protests against political parties?

• Similar protests occurred against conservative ministers in the 80s and 90s.

• Protests have always been peaceful.

• Protests were more common in the 60s.

• Protests are a new phenomenon.

How does the speaker suggest people should judge the party?

• By the actions of one individual.

• By the party's overall policies and actions.

• By public opinion polls.

• By media portrayals.