CLEAN : Mixed reactions over Uber ban in Delhi: vox pops

The transcript discusses the implications of banning a company due to regulatory failures. It highlights the need for proper rules and regulations to prevent such incidents. The short-term ban serves as a warning to companies to ensure employee verification. The incident has raised trust and safety concerns among users, leading to a cautious approach when using the app. Public reaction has been one of shock and reconsideration of trust in the service.

Why is banning a single company considered insufficient according to the video?

• Because it affects only one company.

• Because it is too costly.

• Because it is a temporary solution.

• Because many companies operate in a similar manner.

What is the main purpose of the short-term ban discussed in the video?

• To send a message to the company to improve employee verification.

• To permanently shut down the company.

• To reduce the number of users.

• To increase the company's profits.

How did the incident affect users' perception of the app?

• It made them use the app more frequently.

• It caused disappointment and reduced trust.

• It made them indifferent to the app.

• It increased their trust in the app.

What emotion does the video express about the incident's impact on users?

• Indifference

• Excitement

• Joy

• Shock and sadness

What might users do before using the service again, as mentioned in the video?

• Ignore the incident completely.

• Recommend it to others.

• Immediately order without hesitation.

• Think twice or thrice before ordering.