CLEAN : World sport leaders meet to decide future

The transcript discusses drug use and campus safety, outlines penalties for code violations, and details the revocation of a laboratory's accreditation. It also covers future plans for reaccreditation and the role of USADA in handling sanctions, using Lance Armstrong's case as an example.

What is the main focus of the first section of the video?

• The penalties for code violations.

• The decision to take certain drugs and campus safety.

• The role of USADA in reviewing sanctions.

• The revocation of laboratory accreditation.

What is the penalty mentioned for intentional code violations?

• A two-year penalty.

• A four-year penalty.

• A lifetime ban.

• A six-year penalty.

What is the expected outcome of the new investigative powers?

• To reduce the number of code violations.

• To make the code more effective in the future.

• To increase the speed of processes.

• To eliminate the need for penalties.

What happened to the laboratory's accreditation?

• It was renewed.

• It was revoked.

• It was temporarily suspended.

• It was upgraded.

Who is responsible for reviewing Lance Armstrong's sanctions?

• The World Anti-Doping Agency.

• The International Olympic Committee.

• The National Football League.

• USADA.