CLEAN : South African oppositions reaction disproportionate : ANC

The transcript discusses the President's lack of intention to act against the Constitution, his apology to the nation, and the balanced nature of the judgment. It highlights the opposition parties' reactions, which are seen as disproportionate, and expresses concern over the potential for social division.

What was the President's stance regarding his actions and the Constitution?

• He intended to act inconsistently with the Constitution.

• He refused to apologize for his actions.

• He had no intention of acting inconsistently with the Constitution.

• He was unaware of the Constitution's requirements.

Why was the President's apology considered important?

• It was a legal requirement.

• It showed his commitment to the nation.

• It was demanded by the opposition.

• It was part of a political strategy.

What does the judgment's balanced nature imply?

• It is biased towards the opposition.

• It does not support extreme reactions.

• It leads to a disproportionate reaction.

• It supports the call for impeachment.

What is the concern regarding the opposition's reaction?

• It is irrelevant to the judgment.

• It is based on misinformation.

• It is fully supportive of the President.

• It may lead to social division.

What is emphasized as necessary in the face of potential social division?

• Increased political rallies.

• Intelligent discourse.

• More apologies from the President.

• Ignoring the opposition.