'We need to go further and faster' - Alok Sharma ahead of Cop27

The transcript discusses the UK's leadership in climate change, highlighting the Prime Minister's commitment despite domestic challenges. It covers the UK's achievements in reducing emissions while growing the economy, and the importance of aligning policies with net zero commitments. The global progress on climate commitments, particularly from the Glasgow Climate Pact, is noted, along with the need for faster action. The role of renewable energy and civil society in driving climate ambition is emphasized, as well as the importance of public opinion in shaping government responses.

What signal does the UK Prime Minister's attendance at climate events send?

• The UK is focusing solely on domestic issues.

• The UK is committed to leading the fight against climate change.

• The UK is stepping back from climate leadership.

• The UK is undecided about its climate policies.

How has the UK managed to grow its economy while reducing emissions?

• By reducing economic growth.

• By implementing effective emission reduction policies.

• By increasing reliance on fossil fuels.

• By ignoring international climate agreements.

What was the expected global temperature trajectory if all Glasgow commitments were met?

• 1.2 degrees

• 3.0 degrees

• 1.8 degrees

• 2.5 degrees

What is the expected rise in global emissions according to the IEA?

• More than 5%

• Exactly 2%

• Around 3%

• Less than 1%

What role did civil society play in the Glasgow Climate Pact?

• They had no influence.

• They pushed for more ambitious climate goals.

• They opposed the climate commitments.

• They were unaware of the climate discussions.

What is the significance of public opinion in climate change action?

• It only affects local environmental policies.

• It drives governments to address climate change issues.

• It is irrelevant to international climate agreements.

• It has no impact on government policies.

Why is the ability to protest important in COP processes?

• It is only symbolic.

• It disrupts the climate discussions.

• It ensures civil society's voice is heard.

• It has no real impact on outcomes.