Apple's App Store Is a 'Walled Garden,' Says Epic Games

The transcript discusses Epic's legal battle against Apple, focusing on claims that Apple's App Store policies are designed to lock users into its ecosystem rather than ensuring safety or privacy. Epic argues for alternative app distribution and payment methods on iOS. The discussion covers the complexities of defining monopoly power under the Sherman Act, with Epic and Apple differing on market definitions. The trial will rely on expert testimony and internal documents to determine if Apple's practices are monopolistic. Epic seeks an injunction to open iOS to other app stores, with a decision expected months after the trial.

What is Epic's main argument against Apple's App Store policies?

• They are focused on improving app quality.

• They are primarily about safety and security.

• They are designed to lock users into Apple's ecosystem.

• They are meant to enhance user privacy.

How would Epic's proposed changes affect app purchasing on iPhones?

• Users would pay more for apps.

• Users could use alternative app stores and payment methods.

• Users could only buy apps from the App Store.

• Users would have to use Apple's payment system.

What is a key challenge in determining if Apple has a monopoly?

• Identifying Apple's competitors.

• Proving Apple's intent to harm rivals.

• Finding enough anecdotal evidence.

• Defining the relevant market.

What market does Epic claim Apple has a monopoly in?

• Global smartphone market.

• iOS App Distribution.

• Mobile hardware sales.

• Online gaming platforms.

What role do economic experts play in the case?

• They determine the trial's outcome.

• They analyze market competition and define the market.

• They provide anecdotal evidence.

• They testify about Apple's business practices.

What is Epic seeking as a remedy in the case?

• An injunction to allow alternative app distribution on iOS.

• A financial settlement from Apple.

• A reduction in Apple's App Store fees.

• A public apology from Apple.

What is a potential hurdle for Epic in proving their case?

• Convincing the judge of Apple's intent.

• Defining the appropriate market.

• Gathering enough expert witnesses.

• Proving Apple's payment system is flawed.