Apple Asks SCOTUS to Reverse App Store Ruling Won by Epic

The video discusses a legal battle between Apple and Epic Games, focusing on a Supreme Court case. Apple won a federal ruling stating its App Store policies do not violate antitrust laws, which Epic is appealing. Epic won a California State law claim about competition, which Apple is appealing. Both companies are seeking reversals of parts of the original decision.

What was the main outcome of the Supreme Court's focus on Apple's App Store policies?

• The Supreme Court refused to hear the case.

• Epic's appeal was immediately successful.

• Apple's policies were upheld as not violating federal antitrust laws.

• Apple's policies were found to violate federal antitrust laws.

What did the judge find unlawful in Epic's California State law claim?

• The use of third-party app stores.

• Epic's business practices.

• Apple's restriction on alternative payment methods.

• Apple's entire App Store model.

What is Apple seeking to achieve with its appeal?

• To have the entire case dismissed.

• To change federal antitrust laws.

• To reverse the decision on alternative payment methods.

• To gain control over Epic's payment systems.

What does Epic want to be reviewed in the original decision?

• The judge's personal opinions.

• The decision on alternative payment methods.

• The broader federal antitrust ruling.

• The legality of Apple's hardware.

What was the court's decision regarding Apple's App Store policies in terms of federal antitrust laws?

• They were not considered.

• They were found to be in violation.

• They were upheld as compliant.

• They were partially compliant.