Nothing Broken in Net Space That Needs Fixing: McDowell

The transcript discusses the unprecedented influence of the President on the FCC, particularly regarding Title 2 regulation of the Internet. It highlights the potential risks and uncertainties for cable companies and broadband infrastructure investments. The comparison between the US and European broadband markets is explored, emphasizing the competitive nature of the US wireless market. The potential actions of the FCC and their implications for consumers and companies like Netflix are also examined.

What is unprecedented about the President's actions regarding the FCC?

• The President dissolved the FCC.

• The President vetoed an FCC decision.

• The President appointed a new FCC chairman.

• The President directly addressed the FCC chairman.

What is the main concern for cable companies regarding Title 2 regulation?

• Increased competition from new entrants.

• Mandatory service to rural areas.

• Being treated like a utility.

• Higher taxes on infrastructure.

How does the US broadband market differ from Europe's?

• Europe has more fiber optic networks.

• Europe has more cable companies.

• The US has more DSL providers.

• The US has more wireless competition.

What is a potential risk of applying Title 2 regulation to mobile platforms?

• Increased mobile data speeds.

• Decreased competition among carriers.

• Stifling innovation in the mobile sector.

• Higher consumer prices for mobile services.

What might increased regulation cost American consumers?

• More Internet providers.

• Loss of innovation.

• Higher Internet bills.

• Lower Internet speeds.

Why should companies like Netflix be cautious about Title 2 regulation?

• They need to expand their network infrastructure.

• They will have to lower subscription prices.

• They could be subject to similar regulations as telecom companies.

• They might face increased competition.

What legal issue might arise from the FCC's selective implementation of Title 2?

• Increased lawsuits from consumers.

• Claims of political favoritism.

• Higher taxes on Internet services.

• Mandatory service to all regions.