Thinking and Learning

Thinking and Learning

11th Grade

34 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

Cubism and Surrealism Art Movement

Cubism and Surrealism Art Movement

University

30 Qs

Early childhood brain development

Early childhood brain development

11th Grade

30 Qs

Python Vocab

Python Vocab

9th - 12th Grade

34 Qs

Asesmen Awal Sistem Bilangan, Arsitektur Arduino UNOR3 dan ESP32

Asesmen Awal Sistem Bilangan, Arsitektur Arduino UNOR3 dan ESP32

11th Grade

30 Qs

Assessment in reading

Assessment in reading

University

30 Qs

OHS Incident investigation-Revision Test

OHS Incident investigation-Revision Test

University

30 Qs

TET EDUCATION

TET EDUCATION

University

30 Qs

10212EC112 - Video Analytics - Unit 1 - ICT Tools

10212EC112 - Video Analytics - Unit 1 - ICT Tools

University

30 Qs

Thinking and Learning

Thinking and Learning

Assessment

Quiz

Education

11th Grade

Medium

Created by

Chelsea Chelsea

Used 2+ times

FREE Resource

34 questions

Show all answers

1.

FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION

45 sec • 1 pt

What cognitive bias is demonstrated in Englich & Mussweiler (2001)?

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Anchoring bias is best illustrated when:

A choice is framed in terms of losses

People seek evidence that confirms what they already believe

A decision is influenced by the first piece of information given

A person avoids risk when outcomes are described as gains

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the main experimental manipulation in Englich & Mussweiler (2001)?

Framing the crime as more or less severe

Telling judges the crime occurred in a different jurisdiction

Varying the sentence demanded by the prosecutor (anchor)

Changing the guilt verdict

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

45 sec • 1 pt

What was the main finding of Englich & Mussweiler (2001)?

Judges’ sentences shifted toward the sentencing demand, even when it was extreme

Judges’ sentences were unaffected by the prosecutor’s request

Judges consistently gave lower sentences than both anchors suggested

Judges always gave harsher sentences when the crime description was more emotional

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why is the anchoring effect in this study particularly concerning?

Because it proves that prosecutors always exaggerate sentence demands

Because it shows that judges are deliberately biased toward prosecutors

Because it shows that expert decision-makers can be unconsciously swayed by irrelevant numbers

Because it suggests that sentencing laws are fundamentally inconsistent

6.

FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION

45 sec • 1 pt

The way information is presented can influence decisions. For example, people are more likely to agree to a medical treatment when it is described as having a 90% survival rate rather than a 10% mortality rate. This illustrates the __________.

7.

FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION

45 sec • 1 pt

When a teacher believes that girls are better at languages, they may pay closer attention when female students excel in English but overlook male students who perform equally well. This is an example of __________.

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?