Practice 7 - Engaging in Argument from Evidence

Paul Anderson discusses the importance of argumentation in science and engineering, using historical examples like the geocentric and heliocentric models. He explains informal and formal arguments, highlighting peer review's role in science. The video also covers argumentation in engineering, using Apollo 13 as an example, and emphasizes teaching argumentation in education.

What is the primary purpose of argumentation in science?

• To win debates

• To create confusion

• To entertain scientists

• To provide the best explanation for how the universe works

Which model places the Earth at the center of the universe?

• Heliocentric model

• Copernican model

• Newtonian model

• Geocentric model

Who was the first to propose the heliocentric model?

• Galileo Galilei

• Isaac Newton

• Albert Einstein

• Nicolaus Copernicus

What is an example of an informal argument in science?

• Conducting experiments

• Publishing in a journal

• Scientists discussing theories

• Peer review process

What is the role of peer review in science?

• To entertain readers

• To increase journal sales

• To validate and critique scientific work

• To delay publication

What was the main problem faced by engineers during the Apollo 13 mission?

• Navigation errors

• Communication failure

• Explosion of an oxygen tank

• Lack of fuel

What is a key goal in science education related to argumentation?

• To focus on historical events

• To avoid debates

• To construct and critique arguments

• To memorize facts

What is the first step in teaching argumentation in science?

• Starting with a complex theory

• Ignoring student input

• Using a good question

• Providing the correct answer

What is the correct outcome when three holes are made in a milk container?

• Streams cascade

• Streams form an arc

• Streams remain inside

• Streams converge at one point

Why is it important to set aside ego in scientific argumentation?

• To maintain authority

• To simplify discussions

• To accept new evidence

• To avoid conflict