Farwell Address to the Nation - Arguments and Reasoning

“The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists … this combination endangers our liberties or democratic processes.”

• The United States should focus more on foreign affairs than domestic issues.

• Patriotism and civic education are essential for the future of America.

• The government alone is responsible for ensuring democracy continues.

• The economy is the most important factor in America’s success.

What evidence does Eisenhower use to support his argument that history and civic education are important?

• He warns that other countries have a stronger understanding of democracy.

• He shares a personal story about his childhood education.

• He argues that history should be taught based on importance, not trends.

• He provides statistics about education in the United States.

Tags

CCSS.RI.1.9

CCSS.RI.4.8

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RL.1.5

CCSS.RI.6.8

Which rhetorical appeal does Eisenhower's primarily use when he discusses American values and civic duty? Part A

• Logos

• Pathos

• Ethos

• Counterargument

Tags

CCSS.RI.11-12.5

CCSS.RI.9-10.5

Part B - Which line from the speech best supports the answer to Part A?

• “We’ve got to teach history based not on what’s in fashion but what’s important.”
  

• “We the people tell the government what to do, it doesn’t tell us.”

• “I wasn't a great communicator, but I communicated great things.”

• “America is, and always will be, a shining city upon a hill.”

How does Eisenhower structure his argument to persuade his audience?

• He presents a problem, offers a solution, and encourages action.

• He compares America to other nations to show its weaknesses.

• He lists statistics to prove that civic education is declining.

• He criticizes younger generations for not being patriotic enough.

Which of the following best explains how Eisenhower refutes (prove to be wrong or false) possible counterarguments against his claims?

• He ignores opposing views and focuses only on his perspective.

• He presents lengthy historical examples to overwhelm the audience.

• He acknowledges challenges but emphasizes the power of the American people.

• He argues that anyone who disagrees is unpatriotic.

Tags

CCSS.RI.K.8

CCSS.RI.4.8

CCSS.RI.3.5

CCSS.RI.6.5

CCSS.RI.1.8

What is the purpose of Eisenhower’s statement, “We the people tell the government what to do, it doesn’t tell us”?

• To explain the importance of individual rights and democracy.

• To argue that the government should have more control.

• To suggest that Americans should ignore government laws.

• To show that democracy is no longer important in the U.S.

Tags

CCSS.RL.8.3

CCSS.RL.2.6

Part A - How does the author use the evidence “We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations” to support his claim that spending is of “vast proportions”?

• By comparing military spending to corporate income, emphasizing its enormous scale.

• By suggesting that corporations should contribute more to military funding.

• By arguing that military security is unnecessary for national safety.

• By proving that the government spends more on social programs than defense.

Part B - Why is this comparison an effective way to support the argument?

• It appeals to emotion by making people feel guilty about military funding.

• It provides a counterargument in favor of increased military spending.

• It uses logical reasoning to highlight the large amount of money spent on defense.

• It distracts from the real issue of government taxation.

How does the evidence “The total influence – economic, political, even spiritual – is felt in every city, every State house, every office of the Federal government” support the author’s claim that military spending affects all people?

• It suggests that only government officials are aware of military spending’s influence.

• It emphasizes that military spending impacts multiple aspects of society, not just the economy.

• It argues that military spending should be eliminated to prevent government control.

• It claims that the spiritual effects of military spending are greater than the economic effects.