Unit 2 Intro Vocabulary Questions

Which of the following words means "to assert the opposite of a statement or idea"?

• Verify

• Advocate

• Contradict

• Negate

Tags

CCSS.L.11-12.6

CCSS.L.8.6

CCSS.L.9-10.6

CCSS.W.11-12.2D

CCSS.W.9-10.2D

If someone is trying to "negate" an argument, what are they attempting to do?

• Support it

• Confirm it

• Make it ineffective

• Agree with it

Tags

CCSS.L.11-12.6

CCSS.L.9-10.6

CCSS.W.11-12.2D

CCSS.W.8.2D

CCSS.W.9-10.2D

Which of the following actions would you take to "verify" a claim?

• Ignore it

• Confirm its accuracy

• Disapprove it

• Oppose it

Tags

CCSS.L.11-12.6

CCSS.L.9-10.6

CCSS.W.11-12.2D

CCSS.W.8.2D

CCSS.W.9-10.2D

What is the primary role of an "advocate" in a debate?

• To oppose a cause

• To support a cause

• To verify facts

• To negate arguments

Tags

CCSS.L.11-12.6

CCSS.L.9-10.6

CCSS.W.11-12.2D

CCSS.W.8.2D

CCSS.W.9-10.2D

Which of the following scenarios best illustrates the concept of "objection"?

• A lawyer presenting evidence in court

• A student agreeing with a teacher's point

• A person expressing disapproval of a proposal

• A scientist verifying a hypothesis

Tags

CCSS.L.11-12.6

CCSS.L.8.6

CCSS.L.9-10.6

CCSS.W.11-12.2D

CCSS.W.9-10.2D

How might a scientist "negate" a hypothesis in an experiment?

• By supporting it with evidence

• By confirming its accuracy

• By disproving it with data

• By ignoring it

Tags

CCSS.L.11-12.6

CCSS.L.9-10.6

CCSS.W.11-12.2D

CCSS.W.8.2D

CCSS.W.9-10.2D

In what situation would someone need to "verify" information before making a decision?

• When they are certain of the facts

• When the information is irrelevant

• When the accuracy of the information is uncertain

• When they have already made a decision

Tags

CCSS.L.11-12.6

CCSS.L.9-10.6

CCSS.W.11-12.2D

CCSS.W.8.2D

CCSS.W.9-10.2D

Consider a debate where one side is advocating for renewable energy. What strategic steps might they take to strengthen their position?

• Ignore opposing views

• Present evidence of environmental benefits

• Contradict their own arguments

• Avoid discussing costs

Tags

CCSS.L.11-12.6

CCSS.L.9-10.6

CCSS.W.11-12.2D

CCSS.W.8.2D

CCSS.W.9-10.2D

A politician is advocating for a new policy. What reasoning might they use to persuade the public?

• Highlight potential drawbacks without solutions

• Emphasize the policy's benefits and provide supporting data

• Avoid discussing the policy's impact

• Focus solely on opposing policies

Tags

CCSS.RL.11-12.6

In a courtroom, how might a lawyer strategically use an "objection" to influence the outcome of a trial?

• By agreeing with the opposing counsel

• By challenging the admissibility of evidence

• By ignoring the judge's instructions

• By supporting the opposing argument

Tags

CCSS.L.11-12.6

CCSS.L.9-10.6

CCSS.W.11-12.2D

CCSS.W.8.2D

CCSS.W.9-10.2D