12 Angry Men Test

In "Twelve Angry Men" Act 3, which theme is most clearly represented by the discussion of the switchblade knife?

• The fallibility of evidence

• The power of persuasion

• The importance of civic duty

• The danger of prejudice

Tags

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.2

What motivates Juror 8 to demand a secret ballot in Act 3 of "Twelve Angry Men"?

• He wants to pressure the other jurors into changing their votes.

• He believes it will give those unsure about their decision a chance to vote honestly.

• He is trying to create conflict among the jurors.

• He wants to speed up the deliberation process.

Tags

CCSS.RL.9-10.3

How does the dialogue in Act 3 between Jurors 8 and 9 about the old man witness affect the jury's perspective?

• It makes the jury more sympathetic towards the old man.

• It raises doubts about the reliability of the old man's testimony.

• It reinforces the jury's confidence in the old man's testimony.

• It has no impact on the jury's perspective.

Tags

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.2

CCSS.RL.9-10.3

CCSS.SL.9-10.1

What impact does Juror 11's speech about democracy and the importance of the jury system have on the other jurors in Act 3?

• It convinces all the jurors to immediately vote "not guilty."

• It reinforces the gravity of their responsibility and the importance of their decision.

• It causes several jurors to become more entrenched in their prejudices.

• It has little to no impact, as the jurors are focused on the evidence.

Tags

CCSS.RI.9-10.6

CCSS.RI.9-10.8

How does the dialogue in Act 3 contribute to the development of the theme of justice?

• It shows that justice can only be achieved through conflict and argument.

• It illustrates how personal biases can obstruct the path to justice.

• It demonstrates that justice is always swift and certain.

• It suggests that justice is less important than reaching a quick verdict.

Tags

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.2

CCSS.RL.9-10.3

How does the switchblade knife, once thought to be unique, come to symbolize the fallibility of the judicial system in the play’s final act?

Tags

CCSS.L.9-10.5

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.2

CCSS.RL.9-10.4

CCSS.W.9-10.9

In Act 3, Juror 4 remains one of the last holdouts for a "guilty" verdict. What logical argument initially keeps him unconvinced, and how does Juror 8 methodically dismantle it?

Tags

CCSS.RI.9-10.8

CCSS.SL.9-10.3

By the end of Act 3, what does the play suggest about the limitations of rationality when it comes to complex human emotions? How do the actions of Jurors 3 and 8 embody this tension between emotion and reason?

Tags

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.2

CCSS.RL.9-10.3

How does the storm that occurs during Act 3 serve as a metaphor for the emotional tension and conflict in the jury room? What symbolic meaning can be drawn from the weather changes?

Tags

CCSS.L.9-10.5

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.2

CCSS.RL.9-10.4

• How does Juror 8’s persistence and calm demeanor continue to affect the group dynamics in Act 2? In what ways does he challenge the emotional responses of other jurors like Juror 3?

Tags

CCSS.RI.9-10.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.3

CCSS.SL.9-10.1