Exploring Act 2 of 12 Angry Men

What key argument does Juror 8 present in Act 2?

• Juror 8 argues for the guilt of the defendant based on circumstantial evidence.

• Juror 8 claims that the jury should disregard all eyewitness accounts.

• Juror 8 presents the argument of reasonable doubt regarding the eyewitness testimony.

• Juror 8 insists that the case should be retried due to lack of evidence.

How does Juror 3's attitude change throughout Act 2?

• Juror 3 remains calm and collected throughout Act 2.

• Juror 3 becomes more aggressive and confident as Act 2 progresses.

• Juror 3's attitude shifts from uncertain to assertive.

• Juror 3's attitude changes from aggressive and confident to defensive and uncertain.

What evidence does Juror 5 provide to support his perspective?

• Juror 5 discusses the opinions of other jurors without personal experience.

• Juror 5 references a famous case unrelated to the current trial.

• Juror 5 cites statistics from crime reports to support his argument.

• Juror 5 provides evidence from his own background and experiences related to the defendant's environment.

Which juror becomes increasingly aggressive in Act 2?

• Juror 1

• Juror 5

• Juror 7

• Juror 3

How does the group dynamic shift as discussions progress in Act 2?

• The group remains indifferent and disengaged throughout the discussions.

• The group becomes more collaborative and aligned in their discussions.

• The group shifts to a more hierarchical and authoritative approach in their discussions.

• The group becomes more confrontational and divided in their discussions.

What role does reasonable doubt play in the jurors' deliberations?

• Reasonable doubt allows jurors to convict without sufficient evidence.

• Reasonable doubt is irrelevant to the jurors' decision-making process.

• Reasonable doubt is a standard that favors the prosecution in trials.

• Reasonable doubt ensures that jurors only convict if they are highly certain of guilt, protecting the accused's rights.

How does the setting influence the tension among the jurors?

• The confined jury room setting amplifies emotions and pressures, influencing jurors' tensions.

• The jury room is spacious, reducing feelings of confinement.

• Jurors are influenced by the weather outside, not the room.

• The presence of a judge in the room eases tensions among jurors.

What is the significance of the knife evidence discussed in Act 2?

• The knife evidence is irrelevant to the case.

• The knife evidence was found at a different crime scene.

• The knife evidence proves the suspect's guilt beyond a doubt.

• The knife evidence is significant as it links the suspect to the crime and raises doubts about their innocence.

How do personal biases affect the jurors' decisions in Act 2?

• Personal biases can skew jurors' interpretations of evidence and influence their decisions.

• Jurors rely solely on the judge's instructions without personal influence.

• Personal biases have no impact on the interpretation of evidence.

• Jurors are always impartial and objective in their decisions.

What is the outcome of the vote taken in Act 2, and what does it signify?

• The vote is postponed indefinitely due to lack of consensus.

• The vote is unanimously against the proposed plan.

• The vote results in a tie, leading to further discussions.

• The vote results in a majority decision to proceed with the proposed plan.