iSOP

Are the DSOPs 1 & 2 in Image #1 applicable, and why?

If yes, what tab should the DSOP #1 be applied? Please enumerate the steps in updating the instruction in the OPUS tab.

• No, it is not applicable as the booking has no forwarder

• No, it is not applicable since the booking is Danger Booking

• Yes, it is applicable as the shipper shows in DSOP is the same in the ESI

  GO CUSTOMER TAB (ALT+5), COPY THE REQUEST NO. IN THE ESI AND PASTE IT IN THE EXPORT REF. NO. FIELD AND SAVE

• Yes, it is applicable as the shipper shows in DSOP is the same in the ESI

  GO M&D TAB (ALT+6), COPY THE REQUEST NO. IN THE ESI AND PASTE IT IN THE DESCRIPTION OF GOODS AND SAVE

Is the ICP instruction of the DSOP in the image applicable?

If yes, what would be the ICP code?

What is the correct POD & DEL image update for the CO_NA_0014612 instruction in the image?

• YES, as the forwarder matches in the DSOP and the ICP code is US124995

  
  POD: JAKARTA, INDONESIA
  DEL: JAKARTA, INDONESIA

• YES, as the forwarder matches in the DSOP and the ICP code is US123985

  
  POD: JAKARTA, INDONESIA
  DEL: JAKARTA, INDONESIA

• YES, as the forwarder matches in the DSOP and the ICP code is US124995

  
  POD: TANJUNG PRIOK JAKARTA INDONESIA
  DEL: JAKARTA, INDONESIA

• YES, as the forwarder matches in the DSOP and the ICP code is US124995

  
  POD: TANJUNG PRIOK JAKARTA INDONESIA
  DEL: TANJUNG PRIOK JAKARTA INDONESIA

Is the DSOP in Image #3 applicable? Why?

If applicable, what should be the ICP Code?

• YES, because the parties name matched the DSOP (SH,FRWDR,CNPT)
  

  Code to be used in the ICP: US110936

• YES, because the parties name matched the DSOP (SH,FRWDR,CNPT)
  

  Code to be used in the ICP: US509601

• NO, because the Consignee don't match in the DSOP
  
  Code to be used in the ICP: None

• NO, because the ICP US509601 is not mentioned in the booking.
  
  Code to be used in the ICP: None

Applying the CO_NA_0026449 Instruction in Image #4,

what should be the correct Consignee image to update?

• The correct consignee will be as per SI, because in the SI, the consignee is a company not a private individual.

• The update should be:
  "PT FKS MULTI ARGO TBK" only
  
  - because based on the DSOP, it prohibits to show private individual as Consignee

• No need to update Consignee and inquire since the DSOP stated that its prohibited to shown a private individual as Consignee.

• Inquire the DSOP for clarification

Is the DSOP in this image applicable? Why?

In the Charge Tab, if the downloaded charges (BAF, FAF, CAF) are all in Prepaid,

what should you do?

• - YES, because the Shipper and CNPT name matched in the DSOP.

  - Leave the charges as is, as the instruction stated in the Canada Destination that Freight will be all prepaid.

• - YES, because the Shipper and CNPT name matched in the DSOP.

  - Change the charges into collect, as the instruction stated in the USA Destination that Freight will be all collect.

• - No, because the Forwarder is blank and cannot identified if it matched in the DSOP.

  - Leave the Charges as is.

• Inquire the Instruction for more clarification.

- Is CO_MY_0031971 DSOP applicable for this Booking?

Why or Why not?

- Is CO_MY_0033068 DSOP applicable for this Booking?

Why or Why not?

• • - Not applicable, since the SH/CN is not Kuehne + Nagel
    
    - Not applicable, since the DEL & CONSIGNEE not in bound to West Africa

• • - Applicable, since it is stated in the DSOP to apply ICP.
    
    - Applicable, just to ensure since in transit clause is sensitive in terms of sanction and due diligence.

• • - Not applicable, since the SH/CN is not Kuehne + Nagel

  
  - Applicable, just to ensure since in transit clause is sensitive in terms of due diligence.

• Inquire for clarification

- Applying the DSOP instruction RG_GHQ_0040430 Box A,

Is the update of the Description of Goods correct? And, why?

- Is the DSOP instruction RG_GHQ_0040430 Box B applicable?

Why or Why not?

• - Wrong, because the HS Code is not in the 1st 5 lines of the Description of Goods.
  

  - Not applicable, as there is no word "CONSOLIDATED BALIKBAYAN BOXES" in the Description of Goods and the description is PRINTING INK.

• - Correct, since the booking is bound to Philippines

  - Not Applicable, since the DSOP stated "CONSOLIDATED BALIKBAYAN BOXES" while the SI shows "PRINTING INK" which is not matched.

• - Correct, since the booking is bound to Philippines

  - Applicable, since the DSOP stated "CONSOLIDATED BALIKBAYAN BOXES" which can also concluded that Printing Ink can be inside in the balikbayan box.

• Inquire for clarification

- What OPUS tab can the Route Detail button be found?

What is the Vessel Name of the 1st VVD?

- Applying DSOP Instruction CS_JP_0038235,

What should be the correct Application date to be applied?

• • - Booking Creation Tab | CHARLOTTE SCHULTE

  • - 04/21/2024

• • - Booking Creation Tab |

  • SINAR BANDA

  • - 04/21/2024

• • - Booking Creation Tab |

  • CHARLOTTE SCHULTE

  • - 05/01/2024

• • - Booking Creation Tab |

  • CHARLOTTE SCHULTE

  • - 05/18/2024

• - Is the DSOP instruction in Box A applicable? Why or Why not?

• - What should be the correct No. of Original & N/N Copies to be applied, following the instruction in Box B? Please update your answers using below format:

No. of Original: (Rated, Unrated)

N/N Copies: (Rated, Unrated)

e.g.

No. of Original: (3,5)

N/N Copies: (1,2)

• • - Applicable, since SI shows company name and address, not

  "TO ORDER"

  No. of Original: (0,0)

  N/N Copies: (0,1)

• • - Applicable, since SI shows company name and address, not

  "TO ORDER"

  No. of Original: (0,0)

  N/N Copies: (1,2)

• • - Applicable, since SI shows company name and address, not

  "TO ORDER"

  No. of Original: (0,0)

  N/N Copies: (0,0)

• • - Not applicable, since SI shows waybill, the BL Type should be updated to OBL and change consignee to "TO ORDER"

  No. of Original: (0,3)

  N/N Copies: (0,6)

- Is DSOP CS_JP_0019783 applicable?

Why or Why not?

- As per the CMDT note(Note CONV), how many surcharges should the customer be charged, excluding the OFT?

• Applicable, as the commodity is rubber.

  8 charges excluding OFT should be shown upon autorating.

• Applicable, as the commodity is rubber.

  9 charges excluding OFT should be shown upon autorating.

• Not applicable, as the commodity is not matched.

  8 charges excluding OFT should be shown upon autorating.

• Not applicable, as the commodity is not matched.

  9 charges excluding OFT should be shown upon autorating.