Occupiers Liability

Occupiers Liability

Professional Development

14 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

POP Quiz 110

POP Quiz 110

Professional Development

11 Qs

4th OESAI- KNOCKOUTS- OPENING SHOWCASE GAME

4th OESAI- KNOCKOUTS- OPENING SHOWCASE GAME

Professional Development

12 Qs

False Imprisonment

False Imprisonment

Professional Development

15 Qs

Chapter 12

Chapter 12

Professional Development

14 Qs

LAW - Ch-9  Corporations & Legal Personality

LAW - Ch-9 Corporations & Legal Personality

Professional Development

15 Qs

Training RP 2023

Training RP 2023

Professional Development

9 Qs

Pemahaman Master Data Supplier

Pemahaman Master Data Supplier

Professional Development

13 Qs

limited lines agent

limited lines agent

12th Grade - Professional Development

15 Qs

Occupiers Liability

Occupiers Liability

Assessment

Quiz

Other

Professional Development

Medium

Created by

S T

Used 31+ times

FREE Resource

14 questions

Show all answers

1.

FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Name the Act that creates a duty towards lawful visitors.

2.

FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Name the case where it was held that, "When you invite a person into your house to use the staircase, you do not invite him to slide down the bannisters"

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

"There can be more than one occupier of the same premises." True or false?

True

False

Answer explanation

In Wheat v E Lacon both the landlords of a pub and the brewery that owned the pub were counted as occupiers.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In which case were did people have implied consent to cross a field due to repeated visits?

Lowery v Walker

Jolley v Sutton LBC

Robson v Hallett

Harvey v Plymouth City Council

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Select the case where an abandoned boat was an 'allurement'.

Lowery v Walker

Jolley v Sutton LBC

Robson v Hallett

Harvey v Plymouth City Council

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Select the case where there is implied permission to enter premises in order to communicate.

Lowery v Walker

Jolley v Sutton LBC

Robson v Hallett

Harvey v Plymouth City Council

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In which ONE of these cases was the occupier liable for not keeping a child reasonably safe?

Glasgow Corporation v Taylor

Phipps v Rochester Corporation

Answer explanation

There was no liability in Phipps as Lord Devlin held that,

“The occupier … is entitled to assume that normally little children will be accompanied by a responsible person …"


Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?