EAGE ROCK PHYSICS 2022

EAGE ROCK PHYSICS 2022

University

25 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

Fluids

Fluids

University

20 Qs

FaSSA COLOSSEUM 2.0 SEMI FINAL ROUND

FaSSA COLOSSEUM 2.0 SEMI FINAL ROUND

University

20 Qs

Physics Motion and Acceleration Quiz

Physics Motion and Acceleration Quiz

12th Grade - University

20 Qs

PHYSICS FORM 5 CHAPTER 3

PHYSICS FORM 5 CHAPTER 3

1st Grade - University

21 Qs

UNIT-3 SPECTROSCOPY AND CHROMATOGRAPHY

UNIT-3 SPECTROSCOPY AND CHROMATOGRAPHY

University

20 Qs

MATRICULATION EP015 3: MOMENTUM & IMPULSE

MATRICULATION EP015 3: MOMENTUM & IMPULSE

10th Grade - University

20 Qs

conducting material

conducting material

University

21 Qs

Units, Dimension, and Measurements

Units, Dimension, and Measurements

12th Grade - University

20 Qs

EAGE ROCK PHYSICS 2022

EAGE ROCK PHYSICS 2022

Assessment

Quiz

Physics

University

Practice Problem

Medium

Created by

Mauj Kar

Used 7+ times

FREE Resource

AI

Enhance your content in a minute

Add similar questions
Adjust reading levels
Convert to real-world scenario
Translate activity
More...

25 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

5 sec • 1 pt

This is the 6th EAGE Rock Physics Workshop focusing on

Impact of Digital Transformation

Trends of Digital Transformation

Impacts & Trends of the Digital Transformation

Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Transformation

2.

FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION

5 sec • 1 pt

Dr Manika's Keynote gave insights into Rock Physics of _____ Saturation

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

10 sec • 1 pt

Dr Aus in his keynote mentioned that there are two fundamental aspects that affect your seismic reservoir characterization?

Surface and Faults

Surfaces and Reservoir properties in between

Structures and 4 way dip closure

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

10 sec • 1 pt

ML based Synethic Logs workflow demonstrated by Dr Pavel relied on drilling parameters and

Sonic Log

Density and Sonic Log

Gamma Ray Log

YM and UCS log

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

10 sec • 1 pt

Saleh's DL shear prediction vs conventional shear prediction method on a carbonate field had a correlation coefficient difference of 'only' ....

50%

3.5%

1%

1.75%

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

10 sec • 1 pt

Vagif's talk demonstrated that forward and inverse petrophysical predictions from elastic properties using ANN was ______ than conventional RP models..

Poor

Fair

Better

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

10 sec • 1 pt

Accuracy of mud-weight predictions using ML shown in Pavel's talk had an accuracy of +/- ______ compared to actual data.

+/-10 pcf

+/- 15 pcf

+/-20 pcf

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy

Already have an account?