Unit 2: Vitiating Factors

Unit 2: Vitiating Factors

Professional Development

5 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

Bootcamp Class 3-Option Chain

Bootcamp Class 3-Option Chain

Professional Development

10 Qs

Chapter 15:  Alarm System Fundamentals

Chapter 15: Alarm System Fundamentals

Professional Development

10 Qs

What To Do When...

What To Do When...

12th Grade - Professional Development

10 Qs

Stock Options Basics

Stock Options Basics

Professional Development

10 Qs

Tutorial CGI 002-A (Arthur)

Tutorial CGI 002-A (Arthur)

Professional Development

10 Qs

Measurement in education

Measurement in education

University - Professional Development

10 Qs

L4M3 Commercial Contracting Recap Week 4

L4M3 Commercial Contracting Recap Week 4

Professional Development

10 Qs

C5 - Factors affecting contract validity

C5 - Factors affecting contract validity

Professional Development

10 Qs

Unit 2: Vitiating Factors

Unit 2: Vitiating Factors

Assessment

Quiz

Other

Professional Development

Hard

Created by

Sheryl Tang

Used 5+ times

FREE Resource

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Tony coerce Paul to go into a contract by threatening to harm to his family if he refused. The contract is likely deemed to be invalid due to

misrepresentation

duress

undue influence

non est factum

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Mr Ang, an illterate elderly, signed a contract to invest in an unit trust as the financial consultant told him that it is a low risk and 100% returns guaranteed investment. The contract is likely to be invalid due to

misrepresentation

mistake

non est factum

illegal contract

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Moses used his position as a boss to threaten his staff to enter into a contract. This contract is likely to be invalid due to

duress

undue influence

misrepresentation

non est factum

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

May, blindly signed a contract to be the guarantor for a debt, as her husband told her it was a contract for a new insurance policy he bought for her. This contract will be deemed to be invalid due to

misrepresentation

non est factum

mistake

duress

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Mrs Tham entered into a contract to buy a new functioning Rolex watch. She was not aware that the watch is actually used and no longer working anymore. She would not have entered into the contract if she knew the facts. This contract will be invalid due to

misrepresentation

mistake

non est factum

duress