CER TEKA KES APA NI

CER TEKA KES APA NI

University

18 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

UC1_T4_Razones de participar en los negocios internacionales

UC1_T4_Razones de participar en los negocios internacionales

University

14 Qs

Presupuestos 1er p.

Presupuestos 1er p.

University

20 Qs

CHAPTER 2 : ACCEPTANCE & CONSIDERATION

CHAPTER 2 : ACCEPTANCE & CONSIDERATION

University

15 Qs

Psixologiya bo'yicha savollar

Psixologiya bo'yicha savollar

University

21 Qs

FIP

FIP

University

13 Qs

PERAKITAN PRODUK BARANG DAN JASA (PKK KLS XII)

PERAKITAN PRODUK BARANG DAN JASA (PKK KLS XII)

University

15 Qs

S6 FDLF SIFI 1

S6 FDLF SIFI 1

University

20 Qs

GT Fin - Introducao e Cap Giro

GT Fin - Introducao e Cap Giro

University

16 Qs

CER TEKA KES APA NI

CER TEKA KES APA NI

Assessment

Quiz

Business

University

Hard

Created by

hanim ismail

Used 813+ times

FREE Resource

AI

Enhance your content

Add similar questions
Adjust reading levels
Convert to real-world scenario
Translate activity
More...

18 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE SELECT QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Media Image

what is the case to illustrate INVITATION TO TREAT (ITT) display of good on window shop?

BELL v FISHER

PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY of GREAT BRITAIN v BOOTS CASH CHEMIST

FISHER v BELL

CARLILL v CARBOLIC SMOKE BALL CO

2.

MULTIPLE SELECT QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Media Image

What is the name of the case that describe about advertisement?

CARLILL v CARBOLIC SMOKE BALL CO

COELHO v THE PUBLIC SERVICES COMMISSION

PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY of GREAT BRITAIN v BOOTS CASH CHEMIST

FISHER v BELL

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In RAMSGATE VICTORIA HOTEL v MONTEFIORE, the contract was revoke due to lapse of time.

TRUE

FALSE

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Media Image

This fruits name is

Mangga

Ciku

Kedongdong

Asam

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the name of the case where the plaintiff failed to fulfill condition precedent?

RAMSGATE VICTORIA HOTEL CO v MONTEFIORE

HYDE v WRENCH

PAYNE v CAVE

HARVEY v FACEY

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In HYDE v WRENCH, the contract was not valid as the acceptance was

ABSOLUTE & UNQUALIFIED

NOT ABSOLUTE & QUALIFIED

ABSOLUTE & QUALIFIED

NOT ABSOLUTE & UNQUALIFIED

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Media Image

According to FELTHOUSE v BINDLEY, silent does not mean an acceptance.

FALSE

TRUE

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy

Already have an account?