THE COPYRIGHT QUIZ

In what year was the Malaysia Copyright Act enacted?

• 1999
• 2002
• 1979
• 1987

The first ownership of copyright belongs to author. This is stated under what section?

• S.21

• S.23

• S.24

• S.26

What is the name of the judge in University of London Press Ltd v University Tutorial Press (1916) who had expressed the idea of what is originality?

• Lord Reid
• Hudson J
• Peterson J
• Lord Evershed

When it comes to copyright infringement in Malaysia, apart from the parties, which ministry that is responsible to take action against counterfeit items?

• Ministry of International Trade and Industry
• Ministry of Domestic Trade, Co-operatives and Consumerism
• Ministry of Finance
• Ministry of Education

In the case of Longman Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. v Pustaka Delta Pelajaran Sdn. Bhd. (1987), a total of how many tables and diagrams that have been copied by the Defendant?

• 11
• 304
• 8
• 366

In deciding the question of whether the defendant had reproduced a substantial part of the plaintiff’s work, Gunn J also looked at the test in Ricketson's book called...

• The Law of Copyright
• The Principles of Intellectual Property Law
• The Law of Intellectual Property
• Intellectual Property Protection and Laws

The case of Lau Foo San v Govt of Malaysia was decided before the Copyright Act but the principles were applied and accepted in the case of:-

• Interlego Sdn. Bhd. v Syarikat Jaya Diri Sdn. Bhd.
• Kiwi Brands (M) Sdn. Bhd. v Multiview Enterprises Sdn. Bhd.
• MacMillan & Co Ltd. v Cooper
• Ravenscroft v Herbert and New English Library Ltd.

The case Lau Foo San v Government of Malaysia (1974) was heard in which court?

• Magistrate Court
• Court of Appeal
• High Court
• Federal Cour

Malaysia became a signatory of the __________ for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works on 1^st October 1990

• Vienna Convention
• Kyoto Protocol
• World Intellectual Property Organization
• Berne Convention

"The plaintiffs ran a betting shop. The games that one could be bet on included a weekly football game. They gave out football betting coupons, containing fixed odds for each game, which had to be completed by their clients. The plaintiffs sued the because their coupons were very similar to the plaintiffs’ coupons."
This is the facts of the case in :-

• Lau Foo San v Govt of Malaysia
• University of London Press Ltd. v University Tutorial Press Ltd
• Ladbroke Football v William Hill
• Longman Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. v Pustaka Delta Pelajaran Sdn. Bhd.