African Reactions to Imperialism

Was African Resistance Justified?

By Isiah Jones

Open Ended

List one reason a group might resist being taken over by another. Is there ever a “right” way to resist?

• Analyze primary sources to understand different African responses to imperialism.

• Argue and defend positions using historical evidence.

• Collaborate in structured roles and practice public speaking.

​

Learning Goals: 🎭 Mock Trial: Was African Resistance Justified?

• Late 1800s: European powers rapidly colonized most of Africa.

• Berlin Conference (1884–1885): European nations divided African territories with no African representatives present.

• Motives: economic gain, political power, competition, and spreading European culture/religion.

• Africans were not passive—some resisted, some negotiated, some adapted.

​

The Scramble for Africa

Key Terms to Know

• Imperialism: A policy of extending a country's power through conquest or diplomacy.

• Colonialism: The control or governing influence of a nation over a dependent territory.

• Resistance: The refusal to accept or comply with something; in this case, colonial rule.

• Collaboration: Working together with colonizers, sometimes strategically.

• Protectorate: A state that is controlled and protected by another.

• Missionary: A person sent on a religious mission, often to promote Christianity.

• Assimilation: The process of taking in and fully understanding or adopting another culture.

What Kinds of Reactions Did Africans Have?

• Military Resistance: Some fought wars against colonizers (e.g., Zulu Kingdom, Samori Touré).

• Diplomacy/Negotiation: Others signed treaties or tried to work with colonizers to retain some control.

• Spiritual Movements: Some believed divine intervention would restore freedom (e.g., prophet-led movements).

• Adaptation: Some elites cooperated for survival or personal gain—sometimes switching strategies later.

The Trial Question

Prompt:
Were African reactions to European imperialism justified and effective given the historical context?

• Two Teams:

  • Prosecution: Argues that many African responses were misguided or ineffective.

  • Defense: Argues that African responses were justified and strategic based on the conditions they faced.

Team Roles

Each side will include:

1. Lead Attorney (1–2 students):

   • Open and closing statements

   • Frame the main argument

   • Call on witnesses

2. Witnesses (3–5 students):

   • Represent real historical figures from the sources

   • Must know your figure’s background, actions, and motivations

   • Will be cross-examined

3. Researchers & Evidence Organizers (2–3 students):

• Help gather quotes and examples from the documents

• Assist attorneys with building arguments and preparing witnesses

The Jury & Judge

If you're not assigned to a team this round:

• Jury Members:

  • Evaluate the strength of the arguments

  • Take notes during both sides

  • Decide the verdict based on evidence, not opinions

• Presiding Judge (Optional Teacher Role):

  • Keeps order

  • Enforces time limits

  • May ask clarifying questions

What You’ll Be Doing

Each group will:

• Analyze your assigned sources

• Fill out your prep packet with evidence and arguments

• Prepare your roles and rehearse your parts

• Present your side during the trial

• Listen closely and take notes during opposing arguments

Multiple Choice

What is the main historical question this trial is trying to answer?

• Who won the Scramble for Africa

• Whether African responses to imperialism were justified and effective

• If colonization was fair

• Whether all African leaders resisted

Multiple Choice

What is the role of the prosecution team?

• To argue African responses were misguided or ineffective

• To defend European powers

• To argue in favor of African responses

• To act as jury members

Multiple Choice

What is the role of the Defense team?

• To argue African responses were misguided or ineffective

• To defend European powers

• To argue in favor of African responses

• To act as jury members

Multiple Choice

Why is it important for witnesses to understand their historical figure?

• So they can memorize the source

• To argue against the prosecution

• So they don’t have to talk

• To explain how that person reacted to imperialism using real evidence

Multiple Choice

What kind of evidence should your team use?

• Quotes from primary sources

• Personal opinions

• Wikipedia summaries

• Class notes only

Multiple Choice

How should the jury decide the winner?

• By who talked the most

• Based on who had the better outfits

• Based on the strength of evidence and arguments

• Based on their opinions

• Prosecution and Defense Teams: Gather evidence, prepare opening statements, arguments, and closing.

• Witnesses: Prepare 2-minute testimony summaries with assistance from attorneys.

​

Prep Time (30 min)

What is your main argument against the African responses?

Prosecution Team: Opening Statement

What is your main argument in favor of African responses?

Defense Team: Opening Statement

• Each side calls 3 witnesses.

• Cross-exam questions must cite documents.

Witness Testimonies & Cross-Examinations: Prosecution

• Each side calls 3 witnesses.

• Cross-exam questions must cite documents.

Witness Testimonies & Cross-Examinations: Defense

• Reaffirm your main argument in favor of African responses

Closing statements: Defense Team

• Reaffirm your main argument against the African responses

Closing statements: Prosecution Team

• Opening Statement Strength (1–5): ______

• Use of Evidence (1–5): _____

• Cross-Examination Effectiveness (1–5): ______

• Witness Credibility (1–5): ______

• Closing Argument Strength (1–5): ______

• Final Comments:
  

Judge Deliberation & Ruling
Rate the following:

Open Ended

What did you learn about how different African groups responded to imperialism? Which response stood out the most and why?