Types of Arguments

Front

Definition Arguments examine whether something deserves inclusion within a particular group.

Back

This type of argument has two main parts: the criteria argument and the match argument.

Front

Match arguments evaluate how well something fits the defined criteria.

Back

These arguments are used to assess whether X meets the standards of a particular group.

Front

Causal chains link events or factors to establish a direct cause-and-effect relationship.

Back

This method is often used in Causal Arguments to trace connections between X and Y.

Front

Inductive reasoning determines the probability of a cause-and-effect relationship.

Back

This approach is used in Causal Arguments to infer connections based on evidence.

Front

Resemblance Arguments explore whether X is or is not like Y.

Back

They rely on analogies to argue the similarity between two things.

Front

Proposal Arguments explore whether we should or should not do X.

Back

They propose actions to solve or avoid a problem.

Front

Match arguments are used to test whether something meets established criteria.

Back

They are a key component of both Definition and Evaluation Arguments.

Front

Analogies must be relevant and accurate to be effective.

Back

Weak or irrelevant analogies can undermine Resemblance Arguments.

Front

Proposal Arguments aim to persuade the audience to take action.

Back

They rely on logical reasoning and evidence to support their proposed solutions.

Front

Word Choice: Last night's tornado in Oklahoma did an estimated 500 million bucks' worth of damage.

Back

The term "bucks" is informal and should be replaced with "dollars" for formal writing.