
3.12 Supreme Court Cases
Flashcard
•
History
•
7th - 8th Grade
•
Practice Problem
•
Hard
Wayground Content
FREE Resource
Student preview

31 questions
Show all answers
1.
FLASHCARD QUESTION
Front
What is the significance of Marbury v. Madison?
Back
It established the U.S. Supreme Court’s right of judicial review in federal cases.
2.
FLASHCARD QUESTION
Front
The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas, broke with precedent in deciding the issue of:
Back
segregation in schools.
3.
FLASHCARD QUESTION
Front
What basic freedom is protected by informing arrested individuals that they "have the right to remain silent," and how does it affect them? Options: The right to freedom of speech; it provides them with the ability to speak to their attorneys without fear of incrimination. The protection against self-incrimination; it informs them that speaking to law enforcement could incriminate them. The protection of due process; it prevents convicted offenders from receiving cruel and unusual punishments. The right to freedom of assembly; it prevents law enforcement from asking them questions without the presence of an attorney.
Back
The protection against self-incrimination; it informs them that speaking to law enforcement could incriminate them.
4.
FLASHCARD QUESTION
Front
Which of the following established the principle of judicial review? Article III of the U.S. Constitution, Judiciary Act of 1789, Marbury v. Madison, Worcester v. Georgia
Back
Marbury v. Madison
5.
FLASHCARD QUESTION
Front
In which case did the U.S. Supreme Court rule that the Florida Supreme Court's plan for recounting ballots violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment? Options: Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier (1988), Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), U.S. v. Nixon (1974), Bush v. Gore (2000)
Back
Bush v. Gore (2000)
6.
FLASHCARD QUESTION
Front
The Supreme Court’s decision in Plessy v. Ferguson reflected Americans’ approval of
Back
segregation.
7.
FLASHCARD QUESTION
Front
Which of the following actions comes from the Supreme Court decision In re Gault? Evidence cannot be presented in a court of law if obtained by police in an unlawful search, States must provide minors accused of crimes with most of the same "due process" rights given to adults, Suspects must be informed of their Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights prior to police interrogation, A person accused of a felony who is unable to afford an attorney is entitled to have one provided by court
Back
States must provide minors accused of crimes with most of the same "due process" rights given to adults
Access all questions and much more by creating a free account
Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports

Continue with Google

Continue with Email

Continue with Classlink

Continue with Clever
or continue with

Microsoft
%20(1).png)
Apple
Others
Already have an account?