Understanding Science vs. Pseudoscience

What is a key characteristic of science that allows it to evolve over time?

• Rejection of all new discoveries

• Adherence to traditional beliefs

• Willingness to change with new evidence

• Dependence on fixed ideas

How does pseudoscience typically handle criticism?

• By conducting more experiments

• By adjusting theories accordingly

• By considering it a conspiracy

• By inviting more scrutiny

What is the role of peer review in scientific research?

• To ensure ideas remain unchanged

• To promote personal beliefs

• To provide a platform for unverified claims

• To rigorously evaluate and verify research

How does science respond to new discoveries?

• By maintaining fixed ideas

• By adjusting existing theories

• By discarding all previous knowledge

• By ignoring them

What is a common practice in pseudoscience regarding evidence?

• Conducting thorough peer reviews

• Publishing all findings

• Considering all available evidence

• Cherry-picking favorable results

How does science view criticism?

• As a conspiracy

• As a threat to its validity

• As irrelevant

• As an opportunity for improvement

What is a fundamental requirement for scientific results?

• They must be based on personal beliefs

• They must be verifiable and reproducible

• They must be vague and unquantifiable

• They must be non-reproducible

What is often claimed by pseudoscientific practices?

• Specific and limited effectiveness

• Only negative effects

• Widespread and universal usefulness

• No effectiveness at all

How does science ensure the accuracy of its measurements?

• By avoiding numerical values

• By using precise and standardized units

• By relying on personal intuition

• By using vague terms

What is a common feature of pseudoscientific claims?

• They are based on rigorous testing

• They are always peer-reviewed

• They are often non-quantifiable

• They are universally accepted