Judicial Activism and Restraint Concepts

The video tutorial clarifies the differences between judicial review, activism, restraint, and overreach. Judicial review allows courts to assess the constitutionality of government actions, while judicial activism involves judges considering broader societal implications. Judicial restraint emphasizes strict adherence to the law, contrasting with activism. Judicial overreach occurs when the judiciary exceeds its role, interfering with legislative or executive functions. The video highlights the importance of these concepts in maintaining constitutional values and protecting rights.

What is the primary focus of the video introduction?

• Discussing the role of the president in judicial matters

• Analyzing the impact of judicial decisions on society

• Clarifying the differences between judicial concepts

• Explaining the history of judicial systems

Which article of the Indian Constitution grants the power of judicial review?

• Article 13

• Article 21

• Article 32

• Article 44

What is the significance of judicial review in the Indian Constitution?

• It grants the legislature power over the judiciary

• It ensures the constitutionality of government actions

• It allows the president to make laws

• It limits the power of the Supreme Court

How did judicial activism gain a human face in India?

• Through strict adherence to laws

• Through increased executive control

• By liberalizing access to justice

• By reducing the power of the judiciary

What is a key characteristic of judicial activism?

• Strict adherence to legal precedents

• Focusing solely on individual rights

• Overlooking legal precedents for broader societal good

• Limiting judicial power

How does judicial restraint differ from judicial activism?

• Judicial restraint focuses on societal implications

• Judicial restraint requires strict adherence to the law

• Judicial restraint allows judges to create laws

• Judicial restraint is more flexible than activism

What is the main obligation of the judiciary under judicial restraint?

• To interpret laws creatively

• To challenge legislative decisions

• To follow the constitution strictly

• To prioritize societal needs

What defines judicial overreach?

• Judiciary creating new laws

• Excessive interference in legislative functions

• Strict adherence to constitutional provisions

• Judiciary supporting executive decisions

Why is judicial overreach considered undesirable?

• It supports legislative decisions

• It enhances the judiciary's role

• It undermines the principle of separation of powers

• It strengthens the separation of powers

What is the thin line between judicial activism and judicial overreach?

• Judicial activism can become overreach if limits are crossed

• Judicial overreach is a form of activism

• Judicial overreach is more effective than activism

• Judicial activism is always beneficial