Forensic Handwriting Analysis of Sister Lucy

Bart Baggot, a leading forensic handwriting expert, analyzed handwriting samples attributed to Sister Lucy. His analysis revealed significant differences in samples from 1967 onwards, suggesting they were likely forgeries. The discrepancies in letter forms and structures, such as the letter 'H' and 'S', indicate a different writer. The timeline of these discrepancies aligns with historical and photographic evidence, supporting the theory that another person posed as Sister Lucy.

Who is Bart Baggot?

• A renowned artist

• A famous historian

• A well-known novelist

• A leading forensic handwriting expert

What was the purpose of analyzing Sister Lucy's handwriting?

• To determine the age of the documents

• To detect differences in handwriting

• To find hidden messages

• To assess the quality of the paper

What was the main focus of Bart Baggot's analysis?

• The color of the ink

• The positioning of the letter 'H'

• The type of paper used

• The length of the document

How did the letter 'H' in the new samples differ from the original?

• It was missing

• It was written in a different color

• It consistently went below the line

• It was larger

What characteristic of the letter 'S' was analyzed?

• Its color

• The presence or absence of hooks

• Its position on the page

• Its size

What was a key indicator of forgery in the letter 'S'?

• Its position on the page

• Its color

• Its size

• The absence of hooks

What conclusion did Bart Baggot reach about the post-1967 writings?

• They were incomplete

• They were authentic

• They were written by Sister Lucy

• They were forgeries

What did Bart Baggot find significant about the handwriting differences?

• They were consistent with Sister Lucy's style

• They pointed to a different writer

• They were minor and negligible

• They were due to aging

What does the timeline of discrepancies suggest?

• Sister Lucy wrote all the documents

• Another person posed as Sister Lucy

• The documents were lost

• The documents were destroyed

What does the historical evidence suggest about the documents?

• They were all authentic

• They were irrelevant

• They were all written by Sister Lucy

• They were forged by another person