Brandi Levy Supreme Court Case

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Brandi Levy, a Pennsylvania teenager, in an 8-1 decision, stating that her school violated her free speech rights by punishing her for a profane social media post made off-campus. The case highlights the balance between student expression and school authority, with the court declining to fully prohibit schools from regulating off-campus speech. The ACLU argued for student protection from censorship, while schools emphasized the need to address online bullying and harassment.

What was the main reason the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Brandi Levy?

• She was punished for a social media post made on school grounds.

• Her punishment violated her free speech rights.

• She was denied a spot on the varsity cheerleading team.

• The school wanted to set an example for other students.

What action did Brandi Levy take that led to her punishment?

• She protested outside the school.

• She vandalized school property.

• She posted a profane message on Snapchat.

• She refused to attend cheerleading practice.

How did Brandi Levy feel about her actions and the subsequent legal case?

• She regretted her actions and apologized.

• She wished she had not posted the message.

• She felt indifferent about the outcome.

• She was proud of standing up for her rights.

What was a key issue highlighted by Levy's case?

• The importance of cheerleading in schools.

• The balance between student expression and school authority.

• The need for stricter school rules.

• The role of social media in education.

What did the court decide regarding the regulation of off-campus speech?

• The court fully endorsed the lower court's decision.

• The court left room for schools to address certain off-campus issues.

• Schools cannot regulate any off-campus speech.

• Schools can regulate all off-campus speech.