Edwards v. South Carolina Case Analysis

Edwards v. South Carolina Case Analysis

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies, History, Moral Science

9th - 12th Grade

Hard

Created by

Patricia Brown

FREE Resource

The video discusses the Supreme Court case Edwards v. South Carolina, focusing on the First and Fourteenth Amendments' protection of freedom of assembly. It provides a background of the case, where peaceful protestors were arrested, and the Supreme Court's decision to side with the students. The video also covers the dissenting opinion and the case's modern implications.

Read more

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the main focus of the Supreme Court case Edwards v. South Carolina?

Freedom of assembly

Freedom of religion

Freedom of speech

Freedom of the press

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why did the founders include the protection for freedom of assembly in the 1st Amendment?

To allow people to gather for religious purposes

To enable people to broadcast their concerns widely

To ensure people can assemble for entertainment

To promote government propaganda

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What role does the 14th Amendment play in the context of the Bill of Rights?

It grants voting rights to women

It abolishes slavery

It applies the Bill of Rights to the states

It limits the power of the federal government

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the nature of the protest in the Edwards v. South Carolina case?

Violent and aggressive

Peaceful and non-violent

Secretive and hidden

Spontaneous and unplanned

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the Supreme Court's ruling in the Edwards v. South Carolina case?

In favor of the state

In favor of the police

In favor of the students

In favor of the city manager

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the main concern of the Supreme Court regarding the law used to arrest the students?

It was too strict

It was too lenient

It was too vague

It was too specific

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was Justice Clark's main argument in his dissenting opinion?

The law was clear and precise

The protest was illegal

Public officials need more latitude

The students were violent

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy

Already have an account?